http://www.0xcafefeed.com/2004/06/of-non-static-threadlocals-and-memory/ Thoughts on Java™, Java EE™ and web application development Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:20:33 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.0xcafefeed.com/2004/06/of-non-static-threadlocals-and-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-281 Vladimir Ralev Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:07:57 +0000 http://www.0xCAFEFEED.com/?p=7#comment-281 Absolutely. I just re-discovered it and googled around to see how many angry blogposts would be out there :) Absolutely. I just re-discovered it and googled around to see how many angry blogposts would be out there

]]> http://www.0xcafefeed.com/2004/06/of-non-static-threadlocals-and-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-211 Daniel Woo Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:42:57 +0000 http://www.0xCAFEFEED.com/?p=7#comment-211 I found similar issue in a team code review long before, and I believe Sun should change the Thread class to hold the ThreadLocal instances with a WeakHashMap. I found similar issue in a team code review long before, and I believe Sun should change the Thread class to hold the ThreadLocal instances with a WeakHashMap.

]]> http://www.0xcafefeed.com/2004/06/of-non-static-threadlocals-and-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Glenn Bech Tue, 16 May 2006 10:39:00 +0000 http://www.0xCAFEFEED.com/?p=7#comment-37 Great! Thanks for pointing out a potential application killer, and insight into the ThreadLocal lifecycle. Great! Thanks for pointing out a potential application killer, and insight into the ThreadLocal lifecycle.

]]> http://www.0xcafefeed.com/2004/06/of-non-static-threadlocals-and-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-13 rajiv Tue, 06 Jul 2004 02:52:00 +0000 http://www.0xCAFEFEED.com/?p=7#comment-13 I have posted an <a HREF="http://www.0xcafefeed.com/cafefeed/2004/07/update-to-memory-leaks-with-non-static" rel="nofollow">update to this</a> after receiving some feedback. I have posted an update to this after receiving some feedback.

]]>